private HashMap<String, Tuple6<float[], String[], String[], String[], String[], String>> memberNameChangedToProtectTheInnocent = null;
@register.filter
def rangocinco(obj_id, limit):
if (obj_id+5) > limit:
if not (limit-4) == obj_id:
# print((limit-4), obj_id, flush=True)
return range((limit-4), (limit+1))
else:
# print('SI NO', flush=True)
return range((obj_id-2), (obj_id+3))
else:
# print('NO', flush=True)
if (obj_id-4) < 2:
# print('NO SI', flush=True)
return range(obj_id, (obj_id+5))
else:
# print('NO NO', flush=True)
return range((obj_id-4), (obj_id+1))
Fuck
// Check if marked for deletion and run finalizers
if k8sutil.IsMarkedForDeletion(instance.ObjectMeta) {
return r.checkFinalizers(ctx, log, instance)
}
<?php
$k =1;
for($v = 0; $v < $nt; $v++) {
$bgClass= 'blueBg';
if($k > 1 && $k%2 == 0){
$bgClass= 'whiteBg';
}
?>
<tr class="row_tr <?php echo $bgClass;?>">
<td class="row_td td_column_0"> </td>
<td class="row_td column_1"><?php echo $rows[$v]['nothing'];?></td>
...
<td class="row_td td_column_0"> </td>
</tr>
<?php
$k++;
}
?>
# Weird list cleanup
product = "{0}".format(list(product))
product = re.sub(r"\), \(+", "], [", product)
product = re.sub(r"\(+", "[", product)
product = product.replace(")]", "]]").replace(")", "")
product = ast.literal_eval(product)
I don't know why I get this strange fomat for this array of objects... Ok let's do it fast: 1 - Convert array in string 2 - Clean up string 3 - Convert string in array
if (botCount < botCount)
this.reconnect();
}
My friend wrote this code recently
<?php
if(isset($_POST['csrf'])){
if($_POST['csrf'] !== $_SESSION['csrf']){
return 'session expired!';
}
}
In all Sama Samaneh university and class management system from iran :)
Map<Object, List<Element>> groupeUniqueMap =values.stream().collect(Collectors.groupingBy(this::getCompositeGroupKey, Collectors.toList()));
if(groupeUniqueMap.containsKey(Arrays.asList(null,null,null,null,null,null,null)))
return values;
return doReturn();
public void sleep(long duration) {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
while(true) {
if (System.currentTimeMillis() - start >= duration)
break;
}
}
boolean isUserAuthorized = user.isSuperAdmin();
if (!isUserAuthorized) {
isUserAuthorized = isUserAdminOfEntity1();
}
if (!isUserAuthorized) {
isUserAuthorized = isUserAdminOfEntity2();
}
if (!isUserAuthorized) {
throw new AccessDeniedException("Authenticated user is not admin ");
}
public static MyClass {
private static volatile ProcessManager singleton = null;
public static ProcessManager getInstance() throws Exception {
if (singleton == null) {
synchronized (MyClass.class) {
if (singleton == null) {
singleton = new ProcessManager();
}
}
}
return singleton;
}
}
The double-checking was invented prior to Java5.
The purpose is if the field isn't null, you don't have to synchronize. But since the java memory model specification was cleaned up and Synchronize/Volatile were given much better specification and semantics it is totally useless boilerplate that you should only write if you have to support Java4. There is a Google Tech Talk that covers this.
try{
//...
getMyDataFromServer();
//...
}catch(Excepion e){
// :D
}
HMM FIXED BUG!
//Calculates x² of an integer up to ±1 million
var square = (function () {
var s = "if(A==B){return C;}";
var func = "var A=Math.abs(D|0);";
for (var i = 0; i <= 1000000; i++) {
func += s.replace(/B/, i).replace(/C/, i * i);
}
return new Function("D", func + "return Infinity;");
})();
div.body:first-child:nth-last-child(n+12),
div.body:first-child:nth-last-child(n+12) ~ div.body {
padding: 3px 5px 2px !important;
div.rect {
top: 6px !important;
}
div.legend-action {
top: 3px !important;
}
}
const ws = new WebSocket('wss://echo.websocket.org', {
agent: new HttpsProxyAgent(`https://${proxy}`)
});
wsz.push(ws);
ws.onopen = () => {
if (ws.readyState === WebSocket.OPEN) {
.....
ws.close();
}
};
ws.onerror = () => {
ws.close();
};
u just cant trust, just cant......